Epstein Secrets

tline Response in Opposition 04/03/18 PVD [No Charge] Work on hearing binder re Farmer l e 's Motion to Show Cause, Edwards' Joinder, , E.W. and Jane Doe's Joinder and Motion to ervene 04/03/18 PVD [No Charge] Work on exhibit of comparison of privilege log for in camera inspection; work on Exhibit A

Camera Review; work on Exhibit A to same which compares 47 e-mails (proposed trial exhibit privilege log entries; work on Response to ., E.W. and Jane Doe's Joinder in bankruptcy Motion to Show Cause; work on Response to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause; work on proposed Order Sealing disc and exh

. Rockenbach to have in the pipeline, pending outcome of 3/8/18 hearing; review appellate rules of procedure on certiorari and mandamus relief and Fourth District Court of Appeal's Administrative Order re requests for emergency relief 03/04/18 SJL Work on strategies re case not at issues, Petition for Cert

perfield and Bill Richardson for deposition en 70-75); purported relevancy of pilot and flight logs to show interstate airplane travel in support of Jane Doe's Federal Rico claims and punitive damages (911 77-79); Epstein's interview with a New York newspaper reporter (9191 80-81); Epstein's alleged threat

A040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' MSJ revealing relevant information in pretrial discovery." (emphasis added). The Fourth District explained in Brancaccio that the "Supreme Court has disapproved of procedures which require a party to surrender one constitutional right in order

ff/Comter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe 14

dwards, 4'h DCA Case No. 4D18-0787. (Composite Exhibit C.) CONCLUSION Epstein's general references in pre-trial filings with this Court and in the Fourth District Court of Appeal to the 47 exhibits in question are fully compliant with the Court's rulings at the March 8, 2018 hearing. Epstein has not dissemina

11 would ask the Court to address first. By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE 12 I would like to introduce to Your Honor II 12 For Non-Parties L.M.. E.M. 4 Jane Doe 13 University of Utah Law Professor Paul 13 HATCH. JAMES 4 DODGE, P.C. 14 Cassell, former Federal Judge Paul Cassell, 15 who will present tha

t for record, the case I keep on my bunch is Palm Beach Polo holdings, Inc., et. al versus Broward Marino, Inc. I have the original email from the Fourth District Court of Appeal copy. So I don't have a cite for you, but it's from 2015. That's easily accessible if you'd like to road it. MR. LINK: Thank you.

on as a teen and sexually abused. Prominent Miami at- torney Robert Josefsberg filed the most recent federal lawsuit last week, on behalf of the Jane Doe 101 who allegedly visited Epstein a few times while 17 years old and was paid S200 at least once for her time there, according to the complaint.

f Writer Wednesday, July 01, 2009 €driki- PRINTTHIS WEST PALM BEACH — A lawyer for financier Jeffrey Epstein have filed an emergency request with Fourth District of Appeal seeking to block the unsealing of Epstein's secret non-prosecution agreement with United States Attorney's Office. A circuit judge has or