Epstein Secrets

you represented Jane Doe. .. whether she was considered a victim by the U.S. Attorney's Office?" and then re-phrased: ". . .[D]id you learn whether [Jane Doe 1] was listed as a, or deemed to be a victim by the U.S. Attorney's Office?" Id. at 100-104. Although contrary to law, Mr. Scarola's stated position

ROLA: I am going to object. That calls for attorney-client privilege. 100/9-14 Q. At the time do you know whether, at the time that you represented Jane Doe 1, do you know whether her name, whether she was considered a victim by the United States Attorney's Office? 100/15-23 A. SCAROLA: If that informati

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT

380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 NON-PARTY, JEAN LUC BRUHNEL'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUS E AND FOR AN ORDER TO COMPEL AND 'NCO RPO RATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Non-party Jean Luc Bruhnel hereby files his Resp

a Bar No: 089737 EFTA01660088 Case 9:09-cv-81092-KAM Document 14-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2010 Page 2 of 3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION L.M., ) ) Plaintiff, ) CASE NO.: 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD ) vs. ) ) JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

perfield and Bill Richardson for deposition en 70-75); purported relevancy of pilot and flight logs to show interstate airplane travel in support of Jane Doe's Federal Rico claims and punitive damages (911 77-79); Epstein's interview with a New York newspaper reporter (9191 80-81); Epstein's alleged threat

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-De

asserting liens against recoveries in: a. b. c. L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051)OOO(MB E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB Jane Doe v, Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Ma

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT

s specific claims against Edwards do not give Edwards carte blanche to inquire into any and all sexual conduct and related matters. Nor do the and Jane Doe cases that Edwards filed — which settled — open the door to such expansive and entirely irrelevant discovery, or give Edwards the right to ask Epst

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-De

frey Epstein, defendant. CMA, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, defendant. And Jane Doe, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, et al, defendant. And Jane Doe -- is there a shorter thing that we can do here? It's also missing this one right here. MR. MERMELSTEIN: Do we have a problem with saying Jane Do

Court Reporting Services Prose Court Reporting Services 2 4 Job No.: 1484 Job No.: 1484 2 5 Page 2 Page 4 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.

Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV- 80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jan

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCO

Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV- 80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jan

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCO

f in deposition which had no legitimate baring on the case or the issues to be tried, including questions regarding size of his genitalia; (4) In Jane Doe 2, Edwards represented in pleading to the federal Magistrate that records of communications by and between the United States Government and Epstein's

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCO