Epstein Secrets

solve the pending litigation between them as follows: 1. Dismissal. The Parties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-80656-CIV- Marra/Johnson (Southern District of Florida), with prejudice upon payment and clearance of the

Non- Prosecution Agreement, its Addendum, and Its Affirmation (collectively, the "NPA"), between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Attorney for the Southem District of Florida. First and Second Parties further stipulate and agree that this Settlement Agreement should not in any way be construed as an admission

ing the negotiation of Mr. Epstein's plea deal. The motion requests to add two more alleged victims to the case, including the woman, identified as "Jane Doe No. 3," who said she had sexual relations with Prince Andrew and Mr. Dershowitz when she was underage. On Saturday. Mr. Dershowitz said he "categor

on, and two other high-profile men: a member of the British Royal family and an American lawyer. The motion filed in United States District Court in the Southem District of Florida alleges that Mr. Epstein forced a teenage girl to have sexual relations with several men, including Prince Andrew, Queen Elizabeth's seco

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

using the intemet, acted with a specific intent to persuade a means to engage in unlawful sex). In fact, we have reviewed every indictment filed in the Southem District of Florida in which there is at least one allegation of a violation of §2422(b). To the extent the facts could be discerned from the indictment, we