Epstein Secrets

FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S RENEWED MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVID

be favorable to the defendant on the issues of guilty or punishment within the scope of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976)." The Court should adopt that language to the case at hand here. Interesting, the Standing Discovery Order — and associated loc

,United States,Headline:Epstein settles suit with Jane Doe II; terms confidential, http://globatfactiva.co

amp ROC Sutoatec Agreemat the inicanabon contaned in this document is b alert purposesonly ar4 is not tote used to' mimosasof oeleernntrg an 'NM d ?Agars angibiltrot any met of any Ma FCRA parmatobb papacies Use, further agrees to row soca matenal and intormanco n MtctMt canna/nee net to make tit.a tne

• aitadedataa% • AND ASSOCIATES October 9, 2008 Dexter Lee, AUSA United States Attorney's Office 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Re: Jane Doe # and Jane Doe #2 United States of America Case No.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Dear Mr. Lee: I am writing to call to your attention two potential

may be favorable to the defendant on the issues of guilty or punishment within the scope of Brady'. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and United States. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976)." See, eg., Standing Discovery Order, United States. Enriquex, No. 1:10-CR-20488- MGC (July 9, 2010) (doc. #115). These Standing