Epstein Secrets

his victims. In return, prosecutors declined to bring federal charges. Shortly after Epstein entered his plea, two of his victims, proceeding as "Jane Doe 1" and "Jane Doe 2," filed suit against the Government in the Southern District of Florida under the Crime Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA"). The victims

mi Herald Company (with reporter Julie Brown) appeal from certain orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Robert W. Sweet, Judge) denying their respective motions to unseal filings in a defamation suit. We conclude that the ' The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the

resent Ghislaine Maxwell in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in a defamation action brought by Plaintiff :aka Jane Doe #3). During the course of discovery disputes Ms. Sigrid McCawley, counsel for represented to the Hon. Robert W. Sweet that my client is "under inv

n action brought by Plaintiff :aka Jane Doe #3). During the course of discovery disputes Ms. Sigrid McCawley, counsel for represented to the Hon. Robert W. Sweet that my client is "under investigation" by an unidentified law enforcement agency. She argues, therefore, that she can withhold documents based ini

dge Netburn's Order On or about April 9, 2019, the Government advised Judge Netburn, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. 1). Subsequently,

moved for an entry of a protective order for materials produced in discovery and submitted a proposed order for the consideration of the Honorable Robert W. Sweet, the United States District Judge who was then overseeing the Giu&•e v. Maxwell civil litigation. (See 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP), Dkt. Nos. 38 & 39-1). On