Epstein Secrets

d Jane Doe #2. EFTA00208792 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates. LLC Hollywood, Florida 33020 Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College

ing such information be filed under seal. EFTA00208791 WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that the Motion to Dismiss for lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction be sealed. DATED: November 7, 2011 Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER The undersigned hereby certifies and affirms that a copy of the fore

CWECF - Live Database - flsd Page I of 24 WM U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Internal Use Only Doe . United States of America Assigned to: Judge Kenne

2012 181 Notice of Supplemental Authority in support of Jane Doe #1 and Jan Doe #2's Response to Government's Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Jane Doe (Edwards, Bradley) Modified on 12/11/2012 (Is). (Entered: 12/10/2012) 12 21/2012 M RESPONSE in Opposition re M Motion to Expedite Rul

ARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Ave Ste 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 [Service via

the Court should grant the United States' Motion to Stay Discovery pending the Court's decision on the United States' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and, similarly, deny the Petitioners' Protective Motion to Compel. In both their Response to the Motion to Stay Discovery and their Motion to Compel

IE VILLAFAIZIA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Ave Ste 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 brad@pathto

the Court should grant the United States' Motion to Stay Discovery pending the Court's decision on the United States' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and, similarly, deny the Petitioners' Protective Motion to Compel. In both their Response to the Motion to Stay Discovery and their Motion to Compel