Epstein Secrets

arties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-80656 - Manp/Johnson (Southern District of Florida), with prejudice upon payment and clearance of the settlement amount, however, the Court will be requested to retain jurisdiction to enf

l Release ("Settlement Agreement") in order to resolve the pending litigation (the "Litigation") between them as follows: 1. Case No. 09-CV-80591—Marra/Johnson. The Parties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 101 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-80591 — Marra/J

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The United States in United States of America'. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer a

r to Take Charge of Properly of Epstein, and to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe I. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80893- Marra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The United States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer a

er to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, In Jane Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893- Marra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint