Epstein Secrets

0 ■ Ft. Lauderdale, Florlda'33301 Ill Tel 954:765.0500 ■ Fax 954.765.1477 ■ -www.grlaw.com 2 ACTIVE 53842Q3Qv7 ' CA/Ar~1!~P~Ai~ BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3(27/2023 4:10:49 PM (1) Epstein was treated like others accused ofsimilar heinous crimes, or (2) as appears more likely, those who chose

s Olas Boulevard, Suite 2000 ■Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 ■Tel 954:765.0500 ■ 2 Fax 954.765.1477 ■www.gtiaw.com ACTIVE 53842030V7 BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3^27/2023 4:10:49 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY 1 the State Attorney's prosecution of those crimes in secrecy should be unsealed. The: resounding

ndment right to report information informing the public about the operation of the criminal justice system. See Va. Pharmacy Bd., 425 U.S. at 756-57; Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1283; Richmond Newspapers, 448 U.S. at 596 (“the 5 No-knock warrants have been banned in Florida since 1994. See Slate y. Bamber, 630 So

(“Where a speaker exists . . . the protection afforded [by the First Amendment] is to the communication, to its source and to its recipients both.”), Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1283 n.12 (11th Cir. 2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers and

EV#Jbg. DATE ADMITTED: q/fc/ZoEZ Case No. 2019-CA-014681 JOSEPH ABRUZZO CLERK Joint Exhibit J09 f CIRCUIT COURT I CA/Arqn|IW0>OPQ1M BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY \Filing# 101_840557 E-Filed,01/17/2020 12:23:06 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUD

edings that led to the egregiously flawed 2006 Epstein indictment is warranted under the law. 2 CA/Aronbern.:-000118 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM I To the contrary, transparency is required to promote public understanding of the criminal justice system and public

) (“Where a speaker exists ... the protection afforded [by the First Amendment] is to the communication, to its source and to its recipients both.”); Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1283 n.12 (11th Cir. 2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers and

ceedings that led to the egregiously flawed 2006 Epstein indictment is warranted under the law. 2 CA/Aronbem:-000118 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM To the contrary, transparency is required to promote public understanding of the criminal justice system and public c

(“Where a speaker exists . . . the protection afforded [by the First Amendment] is to the communication, to its source and to its recipients both.”); Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1283 n. 12 (11th Cir. 2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers an

on and/or control of documents that are the subject of this action. Filing # 198551891 E-Filed 05/17/2024 11:40:36 AM FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK, 05/17/2024 11:40:36 AM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY 2 ACTIVE 696232185v3 INTRODUCTION 4. In what is now widely if belatedly recognized as a

“Where a speaker exists . . . the protection afforded [by the First Amendment] is to the communication, to its source and to its recipients both.”); Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1283 n.12 (11th Cir. 2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers a