Epstein Secrets

and foregoing has been provided via United States mail to the following addressees, this "2 1 day of March, 2009. Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire Michael J. Pike, Esquire Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 North Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 [email protected] mpike@bc1cl

.bciclaw.com Isidro Manual Garcia isidrociarcia bellsouth.net Jack Patrick Hill inhesearcvlaw.com Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzella,podhurst.com Michael James Pike MPikeebelclaw.com Paul G. Cassell casselloabciclaw.com Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg riosefsbero@podhurst

hoosing among incrimination, perjury, or contempt." United States ex rel. DRC, Inc. v. Custer Battles, LLC, 415 F.Supp.2d 628, 633 (E.D. Va. 2006). The Eleventh Circuit has not hesitated to support district courts that draw an adverse inference from silence. For example, in United States v. Two Parcels of Real Prop

Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-5012 Fax: 835-8691 Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Michael James Pike Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 515 N Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918 Fax: 515 14 - Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO

515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. Florida 33401 Tel. Fax. By: Robert D. Critton, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 224162 [email protected] Michael J. Pike, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 617296 Attorneys for Defendant Jeff Ry Epstein CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1 Undersigned counsel has conferred

he doctrine of fraudulent joinder to allow the removal of a case to federal court despite the presence of a non-diverse or forum-citizen defendant. The Eleventh Circuit has provided substantial guidance for the district courts in situations where a party removes a case from state court, alleging fraudulent joinder o

65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 15 of 15 Page 15 Respec By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcritabcIclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpikeebelclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-84

Citing to U.S. v. Lot 5. Fox Grove, supra, the Southern District Court, Florida, in Ventura v. Brosky, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006), stated — The Eleventh Circuit has also created a test for these circumstances. stating that where there exists a concurrent civil and criminal proceeding, a court must stay a ci

gment (summary or otherwise) or waiver of his 5ih Amendment right and face potential criminal prosecution. By: ROBERT D. C Florida Bar No. 24162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 ., ESQ. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Cl

). Citing to U.S. v. Lot 5, Fox Grove supra, the Southern District Court, Florida, in Ventura v. Broskv 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006), stated — The Eleventh Circuit has also created a test for these circumstances, stating that where there exists a concurrent civil and criminal proceeding, a court must stay a ci