Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
)(1). Defendant's conduct rose to the level of doing business and was more than a consequential act. Bertrand v. Cordiner at *17 citing Manbodh, 47 V.I. at 283 and Hendrickson v. Reg 0 Co., 17 V.I. 457, 462 (D.V.I. 1980). Even a single act amounting to "transaction of business" in the Territory may
m contacts with the forum that "the maintenance of the suit does not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.'" Godfrey, 18 V.I. at 68-69 (quoting International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945). In evaluating whether the exercise of jurisdiction is fair and re
ntacts with the Territory: That Plaintiffs learned of Fancelli after they engaged the architectural and design services of Juan Pablo Molyneux and J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd. ("Molyneux") to design a large-scale, multi-structure, multi-million dollar residential project to be constructed on Little St. James Island
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
he party asserting personal jurisdiction, has the burden of establishing it." Evans v. General Gases of Y.I., Inc.. 1998 WL 912544 *1, *2 (Terr. Ct. V.I. Nov. 30, 1998). A. LONG-ARM JURISDICTION It must be conceded at the outset that Plaintiffs' failed to reference the V.I. long-arm EFTA00310009 DE
NQUIRY In their First Amended Complaint, it is alleged "[i]n 2005, Epstein engaged the architectural and design services of Juan Pablo Molyneux and J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd. ("Molyneux") to design a large-scale, multi-structure, multi-million dollar residential project to be constructed on Little St. James Island
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
trict Cowl, the Ocderal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence." ° Bostic v. AT&T ophe V.I., 312 F. Supp. 2d 731, 733 (D.V.I. 2004). 9 Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985). 1° F & M Distributors, Inc. v. American Har
ach of contract and negligence. Subsequent y, on December 30, 2010, Plaintiffs entered into a "Confidential Agreement" with Juan ablo Molyneux and J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd. in which the parties provided one another with g' releases with respect to events relating to the Little St. James Project. In its May 16, 20
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (22)
Entities connected to both V.I. and J.P. Molyneux Studio
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON53 w/ V.I.·20 w/ J.P.
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION19 w/ V.I.·7 w/ J.P.
DI
Darren Indyke
PERSON7 w/ V.I.·6 w/ J.P.
New York
LOCATION10 w/ V.I.·2 w/ J.P.
V.I.C.
ORGANIZATION10 w/ V.I.·2 w/ J.P.
DF
Denise Francois
PERSON3 w/ V.I.·9 w/ J.P.
L.S.J.
ORGANIZATION2 w/ V.I.·9 w/ J.P.
JM
Juan Pablo Molyneux
PERSON2 w/ V.I.·9 w/ J.P.
FA
Fancelli
PERSON4 w/ V.I.·6 w/ J.P.
TM
Treston E. Moore
PERSON2 w/ V.I.·8 w/ J.P.
Prince Charles
PERSON7 w/ V.I.·2 w/ J.P.
Superior Court
ORGANIZATION3 w/ V.I.·5 w/ J.P.
the State of New York
LOCATION3 w/ V.I.·5 w/ J.P.
MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL
ORGANIZATION2 w/ V.I.·5 w/ J.P.
Russell Simmons
PERSON4 w/ V.I.·2 w/ J.P.
James Island
LOCATION4 w/ V.I.·2 w/ J.P.
the Superior Court
ORGANIZATION3 w/ V.I.·3 w/ J.P.
J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd.
ORGANIZATION2 w/ V.I.·4 w/ J.P.
Falwell
PERSON3 w/ V.I.·2 w/ J.P.
Little St.
LOCATION2 w/ V.I.·2 w/ J.P.