Epstein Secrets

olvement in his Inc government the court to deny certain affirmative defenses. But Ellsworth responded in the bank's latest filing that it's the V.I. government that bears responsibility for enabling Epstein crimes. "To grant USVI immunity from these defenses would be to allow it to profit fro

th, an attorney representing J PMorgan Chase in its defense of a lawsuit filed by the V.I. Justice Depart- ment in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New Yodc The government has accused the bank of facilitating and profiting from Epstein's aimes. But attorneys for the bank say the government

. The V.I. government has asked the court to deny certain affirmative defenses. Rut Ellsworth responded in the bank's latest filing that it's the V.I. government that bears responsibility for enabling Epstein's crimes. "To grant USVI immunity from these defenses would be to allow it to profit f

ns by Epstein to USVI's schools little le:woes:sand Epstein also lawsuit filed by the V.I. Justice Depart- ment in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The government has accused the bank of facilitating and profiting from Epsteins crimes. But attorneys for the bank say the governmen

te' then '[1]ittle doubt remains that such an intangible interest is property protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.— In re the Estate of Small, 57 V.I. at 423 (quoting Tulsa Profl Collection Serv.. Inc•. v. Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 485, 108 S. Ct. 1340, 1345 (1988)). III. ANALYSIS Pursuant to Rule 24

sity of Virginia School of Law, and Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. Before his academic career, he served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, special counsel for the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, and founding partner of the Washington office of the law firm Kaye Sch