Epstein Secrets

ORDER TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREE/MINE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Petitioners' Motion to Unseal Non- Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein. After consideration of the Motion end the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Pet

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (li ' Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

ORDER TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Petitioners' Motion to Unseal Non- Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein. After consideration of the Motion and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Pet

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown'); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

ORDER TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Petitioners' Motion to Unseal Non- Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffity Epstein. After consideration of the Motion and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Pet

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act