Epstein Secrets

iably distinguished between early and delayed disclosers (g2 (3) =23.09. p <0.000). There were no significant interac- tions between the predictors. Nagelkerke's R2 of 10.5% suggests only a modest association between the predic- tors and delayed disclosure. although the model did show an adequate fit to th

of adolescent& Child Maltreatment. 8(4). 261-272. HLIVka, H. R. (2014). Normalizing sexual violence: young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender & Society. doi: 10.1177/0891243214526468. Humphrey. J. A.. & White. J. W (2030). Women's vulnerability to sexual assault from adolescence to youngadulthood.

liably distinguished between early and delayed disclosers (x2 (3) =2309, p <0.000). There were no significant interac- tions between the predictors. Nagelkerke's R2 of 10.5% suggests only a modest association between the predic- tors and delayed disclosure, although the model did show an adequate fit to th

adolescents. Child .4Ia!treatment. 8(4). 261 272. Hlavka. H. R. (2014). Normalizing sexual violence: young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender & Society. doi: 10.1177/0891243214526468. Humphrey. J. A.. & White. J. W. (2000). Women's vulnerability to sexual assault from adolescence to young adulthoo

bly distinguished between early and delayed disclosers (2 2 (3) = 23.09, p <0.000). There were no significant interac- tions between the predictors. Nagelkerke's R2 of 10.5% suggests only a modest association between the predic- tors and delayed disclosure, although the model did show an adequate fit to th

f adolescents. Child Maltreatment, 8(4), 261 272. Hlavka, H. R. (2014). Normalizing sexual violence: young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender & Society. doi: 10.1177/0891243214526468. Humphrey. J. A., & White. J. W. (2000). Women's vulnerability to sexual assault from adolescence to young adulthoo