ound to make victims more likely to postpone disclosure, opposite to the results from Priebe and Svedin (2008), but in line with an older study by Arata (1998), who found that more severe forms of sexual abuse were associated with less disclosure. Penetration may influence disclosure latency through

ound to make victims more likely to postpone disclosure, opposite to the results from Priebe and Svedin (2008), but in line with an older study by Arata (1998), who found that more severe forms of sexual abuse were associated with less disclosure. Penetration may influence disclosure latency through

en04 nee - e s COM Vefe kyckL.,‘ ‘gkiesc,-kra4, &P...AV_VAPOLD Lactfra. c'emaiceet cetk Cs‘u2A, e .calfieuita 'OtLJAAaaii:k 6ince AdcLeck1 Arata ANcka. W0E* kActrox2-__ \\(.. cPcz(sn c3ae.. comen'efoc.Pci _Ceeker tiv.AA(O c)C -;7 CAM:Ott #1\kfax.611 \02— VC-ittt.A. OPCCC)c,.54-- Kye2g

ound to make victims more likely to postpone disclosure, opposite to the results from Priebe and Svedin (2008), but in line with an older study by Arata (1998). who found that more severe forms of sexual abuse were acvvr•iated with less disclosure. Penetration may influence disclosure latency throug

a ria. mac - - di••• *a. 7.tra t . _ - _ ----=-- sz; riebas.„ Th ois' as sairtio. m.a - .o. • -Z-- mov. ma•••••• - , CMis ;CC; - Arata -•••• 4.1•••• -• mm. • - _ • . .•••••• - . Imit tetalav .4at a e r al en- " -owns. ashram, EFTA00250157 EFTA00250158 EFTA00250159