Epstein Secrets

y, or control of a government agency so closely aligned with the prosecution so as to be considered part of the prosecution team." United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 432 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). "Legal ownership of the requested documents or things is not determinative, nor is actual possession nec

and a wide range of written [BOP] policies and regulations," as well as "statements for all of the witnesses interviewed during the investigation." Gov't Opp. at 8-9, ECF No. 35. Thomas argues that he is entitled to additional discovery on two grounds: (1) Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proced

y, or control of a government agency so closely aligned with the prosecution so as to be considered part of the prosecution team." United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 432 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). "Legal ownership of the requested documents or things is not determinative, nor is actual possession nec

and a wide range of written [BOP] policies and regulations," as well as "statements for all of the witnesses interviewed during the investigation." Gov't Opp. at 8-9, ECF No. 35. Thomas argues that he is entitled to additional discovery on two grounds: (1) Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proced

y, or control of a government agency so closely aligned with the prosecution so as to be considered part of the prosecution team." United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 432 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). "Legal ownership of the requested documents or things is not determinative, nor is actual possession nec

and a wide range of written [BOP] policies and regulations," as well as "statements for all of the witnesses interviewed during the investigation." Gov't Opp. at 8-9, ECF No. 35. Thomas argues that he is entitled to additional discovery on two grounds: (1) Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proced