Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ing concealment or "cover-ups" were not obviously within the scope of the charged conspiracy to defraud the United States by impairing and impeding the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Id. at 20, 24-26. Although the Court denied the motion to strike the alleged surplusage, it ordered the prosecution to provide a bill of particula
ct believes the documents are responsive to the subpoena." In re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas, 924 F. Supp. 2d 549, 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), aff'd, 579 F. App's 37 (2d Cir. 2014); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 408 (1976). It follows that the privilege does not apply when "[t]he existence an
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ing concealment or "cover-ups" were not obviously within the scope of the charged conspiracy to defraud the United States by impairing and impeding the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Id. at 20, 24-26. Although the Court denied the motion to strike the alleged surplusage, it ordered the prosecution to provide a bill of particula
ct believes the documents are responsive to the subpoena." In re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas, 924 F. Supp. 2d 549, 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), aff'd, 579 F. App's 37 (2d Cir. 2014); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 408 (1976). It follows that the privilege does not apply when "[t]he existence an
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ing concealment or "cover-ups" were not obviously within the scope of the charged conspiracy to defraud the United States by impairing and impeding the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Id. at 20, 24-26. Although the Court denied the motion to strike the alleged surplusage, it ordered the prosecution to provide a bill of particula
ct believes the documents are responsive to the subpoena." In re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas, 924 F. Supp. 2d 549, 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), aff'd, 579 F. App's 37 (2d Cir. 2014); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 408 (1976). It follows that the privilege does not apply when "[t]he existence an
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both the Immigration and Naturalization Service and F. App's
United States
LOCATION10 w/ the·14 w/ F.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ the·14 w/ F.
the Southern District
LOCATION5 w/ the·14 w/ F.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON5 w/ the·14 w/ F.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION5 w/ the·14 w/ F.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON5 w/ the·14 w/ F.
Anderson
PERSON5 w/ the·14 w/ F.
Michael Jackson
PERSON5 w/ the·14 w/ F.
George Mitchell
PERSON5 w/ the·14 w/ F.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON6 w/ the·12 w/ F.
SA
Salameh
PERSON4 w/ the·12 w/ F.
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION2 w/ the·11 w/ F.
Michael Cohen
PERSON2 w/ the·11 w/ F.
Alexander Acosta
PERSON2 w/ the·11 w/ F.
The Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION2 w/ the·11 w/ F.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON7 w/ the·3 w/ F.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION7 w/ the·3 w/ F.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON6 w/ the·3 w/ F.
MY
Myers
PERSON5 w/ the·3 w/ F.
Eric Schmidt
PERSON5 w/ the·3 w/ F.