Epstein Secrets

ter and the defendants' motion to dismiss the FAC. In fact, the July 17 Order does not set any deadline for submission of the motion for relief from the Protective Order; it only requires the parties to meet and confer before filing that motion — which the defendants attempted to do with Mr. Edwards. Moreover, the J

king relief from a protective order issued in the Gee v. Maxwell matter ("Protective Order" and "Giuffre Matte?) and ii) to dismiss the plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the above-captioned matter ("Jane Doe Matter"), and b) your request for an opportunity to depose Jeffrey Epstein. As a preliminary matte

s they agreed to be bound by a Protective Order. Each victim (or her attorney) was provided with notice of the Court's ruling, and several executed the Protective Order and were provided with copies of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. From the beginning, Epstein has "vigorously defended" the suits, and has filed seve

o allow suit by any person who, "while a minor," was a victim of a violation. PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 9 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT EFTA00189795 First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement (which is attached hereto): A. The applicable version of § 2255 only permits "minor" to sue:

ter and the defendants' motion to dismiss the FAC. In fact, the July 17 Order does not set any deadline for submission of the motion for relief from the Protective Order; it only requires the parties to meet and confer before filing that motion — which the defendants attempted to do with Mr. Edwards. Moreover, the J

s i) seeking relief from a protective order issued in the v. Maxwell matter ("Protective Order" and "M Matte?) and ii) to dismiss the plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the above-captioned matter ("Jane Doe Matter"), and b) your request for an opportunity to depose Jeffrey Epstein. As a preliminary matte