Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6/2015 Page 14 of 51 a governmental attorney-client privilege applicable in criminal proceedings inquiring into the actions of public officials."). The Eighth Circuit did not purport to espouse a broad-ranging rule that defeated existing, well-defined privileges such as the work product doctrine. This is importan
responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(1) Finally, Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6/2015 Page 14 of 51 a governmental attorney-client privilege applicable in criminal proceedings inquiring into the actions of public officials."). The Eighth Circuit did not purport to espouse a broad-ranging rule that defeated existing, well-defined privileges such as the work product doctrine. This is importan
responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(2)(1) Finally. Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6/2015 Page 14 of 51 a governmental attorney-client privilege applicable in criminal proceedings inquiring into the actions of public officials."). The Eighth Circuit did not purport to espouse a broad-ranging rule that defeated existing, well-defined privileges such as the work product doctrine. This is importan
responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(1) Finally, Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
6/2015 Page 14 of 51 a governmental attorney-client privilege applicable in criminal proceedings inquiring into the actions of public officials."). The Eighth Circuit did not purport to espouse a broad-ranging rule that defeated existing, well-defined privileges such as the work product doctrine. This is importan
responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(1) Finally, Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (65)
Entities connected to both The Eighth Circuit and Initial Disclosures
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON23 w/ The·7 w/ Initial
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION21 w/ The·4 w/ Initial
United States
LOCATION19 w/ The·5 w/ Initial
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON19 w/ The·4 w/ Initial
the Southern District
LOCATION15 w/ The·6 w/ Initial
the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility
ORGANIZATION15 w/ The·4 w/ Initial
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION14 w/ The·3 w/ Initial
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON12 w/ The·2 w/ Initial
Kenneth Marra
PERSON5 w/ The·6 w/ Initial
Michael Jackson
PERSON5 w/ The·5 w/ Initial
the Federal Rules of Civil
ORGANIZATION4 w/ The·6 w/ Initial
WR
Wright
PERSON5 w/ The·4 w/ Initial
Michael Douglas
PERSON5 w/ The·4 w/ Initial
ST
Subpoena Duces Tecum
PERSON4 w/ The·5 w/ Initial
George W. Bush
PERSON4 w/ The·5 w/ Initial
D.C. Cir
ORGANIZATION5 w/ The·4 w/ Initial
the Executive Office's
ORGANIZATION4 w/ The·4 w/ Initial
Carnegie
ORGANIZATION4 w/ The·4 w/ Initial
WA
Wayte
PERSON4 w/ The·4 w/ Initial
Table
ORGANIZATION4 w/ The·4 w/ Initial