Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rges a single offense as an offense multiple times, in separate counts, when, in law and fact, only one crime has been committed." United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140, 145 (2d Cir. 1999); see also United States v. Jones, 482 F.3d 60, 72 (2d Cir. 2006) ("A claim of multiplicity cannot succeed, however
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rges a single offense as an offense multiple times, in separate counts, when, in law and fact, only one crime has been committed." United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140, 145 (2d Cir. 1999); see also United States v. Jones, 482 F.3d 60, 72 (2d Cir. 2006) ("A claim of multiplicity cannot succeed, however
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rges a single offense as an offense multiple times, in separate counts, when, in law and fact, only one crime has been committed." United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140, 145 (2d Cir. 1999); see also United States v. Jones, 482 F.3d 60, 72 (2d Cir. 2006) ("A claim of multiplicity cannot succeed, however
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rges a single offense as an offense multiple times, in separate counts, when, in law and fact, only one crime has been committed." United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140, 145 (2d Cir. 1999); see also United States v. Jones, 482 F.3d 60, 72 (2d Cir. 2006) ("A claim of multiplicity cannot succeed, however
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Chacko and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON30 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON26 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION25 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
NE
Nejad
PERSON24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
GA
Gaudin
PERSON24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
MA
Markiewicz
PERSON24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
Forde
ORGANIZATION24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
SA
Sampson
PERSON24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
Medina
PERSON24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
TH
Thompson
PERSON24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
Napolitano
PERSON24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
WE
Werner
PERSON24 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
CO
Concepcion
PERSON23 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
MO
Mostafa
PERSON23 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON22 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION21 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
Adriana Ross
PERSON21 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION21 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.
NE
Nersesian
PERSON21 w/ Chacko·4 w/ N.Y.