Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
case, the "answers associated with the questions posed may be insufficient as a matter of law to support the perjury conviction." United States v. Markiewicz, 978 F.2d 786, 808 (2d Cir. 1992) (quoting Lighte, 782 F.2d at 375). For instance, in Lighte, a case involving post-conviction appellate review, the
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
case, the "answers associated with the questions posed may be insufficient as a matter of law to support the perjury conviction." United States v. Markiewicz, 978 F.2d 786, 808 (2d Cir. 1992) (quoting Lighte, 782 F.2d at 375). For instance, in Lighte, a case involving post-conviction appellate review, the
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
case, the "answers associated with the questions posed may be insufficient as a matter of law to support the perjury conviction." United States v. Markiewicz, 978 F.2d 786, 808 (2d Cir. 1992) (quoting Lighte, 782 F.2d at 375). For instance, in Lighte, a case involving post-conviction appellate review, the
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
case, the "answers associated with the questions posed may be insufficient as a matter of law to support the perjury conviction." United States v. Markiewicz, 978 F.2d 786, 808 (2d Cir. 1992) (quoting Lighte, 782 F.2d at 375). For instance, in Lighte, a case involving post-conviction appellate review, the
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Markiewicz and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON25 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
SA
Sampson
PERSON24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
CH
Chacko
PERSON24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
Napolitano
PERSON24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
Forde
ORGANIZATION24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
TH
Thompson
PERSON24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
WE
Werner
PERSON24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
GA
Gaudin
PERSON24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
Medina
PERSON24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
NE
Nejad
PERSON24 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
CO
Concepcion
PERSON23 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
MO
Mostafa
PERSON23 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION21 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON21 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
NE
Nersesian
PERSON21 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
Adriana Ross
PERSON21 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION21 w/ Markiewicz·4 w/ N.Y.