Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
10 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns courthouse. Id. at Art. III.B. The Manhattan Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: New York, Bronx, Westchester, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Ro
r, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Rockland, Orange, Sullivan, and Dutchess. See id. Both Master Jury Wheels are emptied and refilled no later than September 1 following the date of
decision theory, the comparative disparity theory, and the absolute disparity theory. See Rioux, 97 F.3d at 655. Although no method is perfect, see Berghuis v. Smith, 559 U.S. 314, 329 (2010), the Second Circuit has made clear that the comparative disparity theory is disfavored and strongly suggested that the ab
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns courthouse. Id. at Art. III.B. The Manhattan Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: New York, Bronx, Westchester, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Ro
r, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Rockland, Orange, Sullivan, and Dutchess. See id. Both Master Jury Wheels are emptied and refilled no later than September 1 following the date of
decision theory, the comparative disparity theory, and the absolute disparity theory. See Biota, 97 F.3d at 655. Although no method is perfect, see Berghuis v. Smith, 559 U.S. 314, 329 (2010), the Second Circuit has made clear that the comparative disparity theory is disfavored and strongly suggested that the ab
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns courthouse. Id. at Art. III.B. The Manhattan Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: New York, Bronx, Westchester, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Ro
r, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Rockland, Orange, Sullivan, and Dutchess. See id. Both Master Jury Wheels are emptied and refilled no later than September 1 following the date of
decision theory, the comparative disparity theory, and the absolute disparity theory. See Biota, 97 F.3d at 655. Although no method is perfect, see Berghuis v. Smith, 559 U.S. 314, 329 (2010), the Second Circuit has made clear that the comparative disparity theory is disfavored and strongly suggested that the ab
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
r, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Rockland, Orange, Sullivan, and Dutchess. See id. Both Master Jury Wheels are emptied and refilled no later than September 1 following the date of
ns courthouse. Id. at Art. III.B. The Manhattan Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: New York, Bronx, Westchester, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Ro
decision theory, the comparative disparity theory, and the absolute disparity theory. See Rioux, 97 F.3d at 655. Although no method is perfect, see Berghuis v. Smith, 559 U.S. 314, 329 (2010), the Second Circuit has made clear that the comparative disparity theory is disfavored and strongly suggested that the ab
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns courthouse. Id. at Art. III.B. The Manhattan Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: New York, Bronx, Westchester, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Ro
r, Putnam, and Rockland. See id. at Art. III.C. The White Plains Master Jury Wheel draws from voter lists from the following counties: Westchester, Putnam, Rockland, Orange, Sullivan, and Dutchess. See id. Both Master Jury Wheels are emptied and refilled no later than September 1 following the date of
decision theory, the comparative disparity theory, and the absolute disparity theory. See Biota, 97 F.3d at 655. Although no method is perfect, see Berghuis v. Smith, 559 U.S. 314, 329 (2010), the Second Circuit has made clear that the comparative disparity theory is disfavored and strongly suggested that the ab
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (151)
Entities connected to both Putnam and Berghuis v. Smith
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON121 w/ Putnam·10 w/ Berghuis
LB
Leon Black
PERSON115 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
Prince Andrew
PERSON113 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
Colorado
LOCATION110 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON105 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
RU
Rubin
PERSON102 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
Alexander Acosta
PERSON101 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
Audrey Strauss
PERSON79 w/ Putnam·10 w/ Berghuis
George W. Bush
PERSON49 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
CH
Christopher
PERSON25 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON16 w/ Putnam·10 w/ Berghuis
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON14 w/ Putnam·10 w/ Berghuis
Bronx
LOCATION12 w/ Putnam·10 w/ Berghuis
Jackman
PERSON12 w/ Putnam·9 w/ Berghuis
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON11 w/ Putnam·10 w/ Berghuis
United States
LOCATION10 w/ Putnam·10 w/ Berghuis
Dutchess
LOCATION15 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
TR
Tracy
PERSON9 w/ Putnam·10 w/ Berghuis
SU
Sullivan
PERSON14 w/ Putnam·5 w/ Berghuis
Barneys New York
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Putnam·10 w/ Berghuis