Epstein Secrets

use of privilege, reviewing court must weigh potential harm from disclosure against benefits of disclosure. @ 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. EFTA00186711 824 F.Supp. 330 Page 12 (Cite as: 824 F.Supp. 330, *331) •331 John J. DeFranks, J. Michael Marion, Asst. Erie County Dist

[1][2][3] It is well-established that a federal grand jury is to be afforded wide latitude in conducting its investigation. See United States v. R. Enters., Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 297-98, 111 S.Ct. 722, 726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561

Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida initiated a grand jury investigation into allegations of improper 0 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. EFTA00186754 832 F.2d 554 (Cite as: 832 F.2d 554, *555) influence peddling by certain public officials of the City of Jacksonville. Wi

cordance with its broad mandate to investigate possible criminal activity, a federal grand jury has few limitations placed on its subpoena powers. R. Enters., 498 U.S. at 297-98, Ill S.Ct. at 726. "A grand jury 'may compel the production of evidence or the testimony of witnesses as it considers appropr

Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida initiated a grand jury investigation into allegations of improper C 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. EFTA00277554 88/66/2086 20:43 FAX 5618021787 tISA0 UPS FL 1j006 832 F.2d 554 (Cite as: 832 F.2d 554, *555) influence peddling by cert

[1][2][3] It is well-established that a federal grand jury is to be afforded wide latitude in conducting its investigation. See United States v. R. Enters., Inc.. 498 U.S. 292. 297-98, Ill S.Ct. 722, 726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561

Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida initiated a grand jury investigation into allegations of improper sti 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. EFTA01699660 09/06/2006 20:43 FAX 5618021787 IJSAO ¶VFB FL tN06 832 F.2d 554 (Cite as: 832 F.2d 554, 955) influence peddling by certa

[1][2][3] It is well-established that a federal grand jury is to be afforded wide latitude in conducting its investigation. See United States v. R. Enters., Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 297-98, 111 S.Q. 722, 726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991); United Stares v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (

cause of privilege, reviewing court must weigh potential harm from disclosure against benefits of disclosure. 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-000117 EFTA00227497 • • • 824 F.Supp. 330 Page 12 (Cite as: 824 F.Supp. 330, •331) •331 John J. DeFra

(11(21(3) It is well-established that a federal grand jury is to be afforded wide latitude in conducting its investigation. See United States v. R. Enters., Inc.. 498 U.S. 292, 297.98, Ill S.Ct. 722, 726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991); United States v. Calandra. 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613. 38 L.Ed.2d 561