Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ent domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ent domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ent domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes,
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ent domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ent domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ent domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes,
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (116)
Entities connected to both Fischhoff and Strohmaier et al.
FO
Forgas
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
JE
Jessica Engle
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
O'
O'Donohue
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
ED
Emily R. Dworkin
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
MB
Michele Bedard-Gilligan
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
SF
Skye Fitzpatrick
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
CZ
Caron Zlotnick
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
MW
Meredith Warshaw
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
the American Psychiatric Association
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
the University of Virginia Schools of Law and Medicine
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
the New York Asset Forfeiture Task Force
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
Florida International University
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
LA
Laham
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
IRS-CI
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
Bill Clinton
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
the United States Department of the Treasury
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier
the United States Secret Service
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·6 w/ Strohmaier