Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page EFTA00016272Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
Page: EFTA00016272 →be significantly more foreseeable than judges who did not receive outcome information and were thus more likely to render a finding of negligence (Oeberst & Goeckenjan, 2016). Another notable study detected hindsight bias in a sample of mental health professionals who gauged the dangerousness of a psychiatric patie
Page: EFTA00016272 →2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
be significantly more foreseeable than judges who did not receive outcome information and were thus more likely to render a finding of negligence (Oeberst & Goeckenjan, 2016). Another notable study detected hindsight bias in a sample of mental health professionals who gauged the dangerousness of a psychiatric patie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
be significantly more foreseeable than judges who did not receive outcome information and were thus more likely to render a finding of negligence (Oeberst & Goeckenjan, 2016). Another notable study detected hindsight bias in a sample of mental health professionals who gauged the dangerousness of a psychiatric patie
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
be significantly more foreseeable than judges who did not receive outcome information and were thus more likely to render a finding of negligence (Oeberst & Goeckenjan, 2016). Another notable study detected hindsight bias in a sample of mental health professionals who gauged the dangerousness of a psychiatric patie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
be significantly more foreseeable than judges who did not receive outcome information and were thus more likely to render a finding of negligence (Oeberst & Goeckenjan, 2016). Another notable study detected hindsight bias in a sample of mental health professionals who gauged the dangerousness of a psychiatric patie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
be significantly more foreseeable than judges who did not receive outcome information and were thus more likely to render a finding of negligence (Oeberst & Goeckenjan, 2016). Another notable study detected hindsight bias in a sample of mental health professionals who gauged the dangerousness of a psychiatric patie
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
be significantly more foreseeable than judges who did not receive outcome information and were thus more likely to render a finding of negligence (Oeberst & Goeckenjan, 2016). Another notable study detected hindsight bias in a sample of mental health professionals who gauged the dangerousness of a psychiatric patie
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (116)
Entities connected to both Fischhoff and Oeberst & Goeckenjan
GA
Gawronski
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
FO
Forgas
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
JE
Jessica Engle
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
O'
O'Donohue
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
ED
Emily R. Dworkin
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
MB
Michele Bedard-Gilligan
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
SF
Skye Fitzpatrick
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
CZ
Caron Zlotnick
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
MW
Meredith Warshaw
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
Pohl & Erdfelder
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
Arkes
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
the University of Virginia Schools of Law and Medicine
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
the American Psychiatric Association
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
the Journal of Threat Assessment and Management
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
Roese & Vohs
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
the United States Secret Service
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
IRS-CI
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst
Marc Rich
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Oeberst