Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page EFTA00016272Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
Page: EFTA00016272 →, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes, visual stimuli (e.g., Bernstein & Harley, 2007), and auditory stimuli (e.g., B
Page: EFTA00016272 →2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes, visual stimuli (e.g., Bernstein & Harley, 2007), and auditory stimuli (e.g., B
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes, visual stimuli (e.g., Bernstein & Harley, 2007), and auditory stimuli (e.g., B
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes, visual stimuli (e.g., Bernstein & Harley, 2007), and auditory stimuli (e.g., B
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes, visual stimuli (e.g., Bernstein & Harley, 2007), and auditory stimuli (e.g., B
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes, visual stimuli (e.g., Bernstein & Harley, 2007), and auditory stimuli (e.g., B
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli such as written vignettes, visual stimuli (e.g., Bernstein & Harley, 2007), and auditory stimuli (e.g., B
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (116)
Entities connected to both Fischhoff and Pohl & Erdfelder
GA
Gawronski
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
FO
Forgas
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
JE
Jessica Engle
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
O'
O'Donohue
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
ED
Emily R. Dworkin
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
MB
Michele Bedard-Gilligan
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
SF
Skye Fitzpatrick
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
CZ
Caron Zlotnick
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
MW
Meredith Warshaw
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
Bernstein & Harley
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
Arkes
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
the University of Virginia Schools of Law and Medicine
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
the American Psychiatric Association
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
the Journal of Threat Assessment and Management
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
Roese & Vohs
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
the United States Secret Service
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
IRS-CI
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl
Marc Rich
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Pohl