Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page EFTA00016272Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
Page: EFTA00016272 →ety of different domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli su
Page: EFTA00016272 →2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ety of different domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli su
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ety of different domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli su
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ety of different domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli su
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ety of different domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli su
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ety of different domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli su
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mation about the outcome. Hindsight bias refers to the tendency to overestimate how predictable an event is after learning the outcome of the event (Fischhoff, 1975). For example, after a political election, people believe their pre-election estimates of the outcome were closer to the outcome than they ac
ety of different domains including medicine, financial decision making, consumer satisfaction, and within the legal domain (see Roese & Vohs, 2012; Arkes, 2013; Strohmaier et al., 2021) and using a variety of different experimental designs (Pohl & Erdfelder, 2016) and a variety of different stimuli su
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (116)
Entities connected to both Fischhoff and Arkes
GA
Gawronski
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
FO
Forgas
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
JE
Jessica Engle
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
O'
O'Donohue
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
ED
Emily R. Dworkin
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
MB
Michele Bedard-Gilligan
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
SF
Skye Fitzpatrick
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
CZ
Caron Zlotnick
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
MW
Meredith Warshaw
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
Bernstein & Harley
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
Pohl & Erdfelder
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
the University of Virginia Schools of Law and Medicine
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
the American Psychiatric Association
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
the Journal of Threat Assessment and Management
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
Roese & Vohs
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
the United States Secret Service
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
IRS-CI
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes
Marc Rich
PERSON7 w/ Fischhoff·7 w/ Arkes