Epstein Secrets

e documents being held by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the other district that is handling conflict matters. (It appears that this other office is the Middle District of Florida.) This appears to be improbable, because the conflict matters would presumably generate many documents covered by the victims' discovery

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00208647 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 41 of 64 On September 26, 2011, the Court den

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

e documents being held by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the other district that is handling conflict matters. (It appears that this other office is the Middle District of Florida.) This appears to be improbable, because the conflict matters would presumably generate many documents covered by the victims' discovery

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00615908 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 265-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2014 Page 41 of 64 On September 26, 2011, the Court den

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

miss, page 8, n. 8][DE 119). However, it contends, without explanation, that the September 24, 2007 non-prosecution agreement would still constrain the Middle District of Florida United States Attorney's Office "due to that office's recusal- based derivative prosecutorial responsibilities in the Southern District of

1 a Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts by Jane Doe. (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 03/21/2011) • 03/21/2011 52 Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing

n roa Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts filed by United States of America. (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 04/07/2011) 04/07/2011 52 RESPONSE in Opposition rejQ Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1 and

e documents being held by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the other district that is handling conflict matters. (It appears that this other office is the Middle District of Florida.) This appears to be improbable, because the conflict matters would presumably generate many documents covered by the victims' discovery

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00081155 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 41 of 64 On September 26, 2011, the Court den

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

ive entity, and any grand jury investigating these (or releated) allegations, including any grand jury meeting in the Southern District of Florida, the Middle District of Florida, the District of EFTA00179741 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 44 of 64 New Jersey, and/o

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00179738 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 41 of 64 On September 26, 2011, the Court den

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, however, the Co

ive entity, and any grand jury investigating these (or releated) allegations, including any grand jury meeting in the Southern District of Florida, the Middle District of Florida, the District of EFTA00205319 New Jersey, and/or the District of Columbia. For this one discovery request only, please include all rel

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00205316 On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, h

ive entity, and any grand jury investigating these (or releated) allegations, including any grand jury meeting in the Southern District of Florida, the Middle District of Florida, the District of EFTA00205409 New Jersey, and/or the District of Columbia. For this one discovery request only, please include all rel

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00205406 On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, h

ive entity, and any grand jury investigating these (or releated) allegations, including any grand jury meeting in the Southern District of Florida, the Middle District of Florida, the District of EFTA00205310 New Jersey, and/or the District of Columbia. For this one discovery request only, please include all rel

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00205307 On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, h

ive entity, and any grand jury investigating these (or releated) allegations, including any grand jury meeting in the Southern District of Florida, the Middle District of Florida, the District of EFTA00207811 New Jersey, and/or the District of Columbia. For this one discovery request only, please include all rel

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00207808 On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, h

ive entity, and any grand jury investigating these (or releated) allegations, including any grand jury meeting in the Southern District of Florida, the Middle District of Florida, the District of EFTA00207954 New Jersey, and/or the District of Columbia. For this one discovery request only, please include all rel

(the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49). EFTA00207951 On September 26, 2011, the Court denied the victims' motion to have their facts accepted (DE 99 at 11). At the same time, h