Epstein Secrets

tial materials, scenes All, Today the Marshals and the FBI informed me that they are able to arrange for your client and the evidence to be at 500 Pearl in time for the review to start as early as 8am each morning of the review period. The review can still continue until 4:30pm each day. In order to

ure nudity. As referenced above, once your team has seen those photos for yourselves, you can let me know if you will need any to be brought to 500 Pearl. EFTA00026891 • As I mentioned previously and is indicated in the spreadsheet, we are preparing a letter to defense counsel explaining why you wi

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

d, I have several issues. First, there are a couple of items that you have noted for the Bronx Warehouse but will in fact need to be brought to 500 Pearl for review because you labeled them as "Highly Confidential" and not "bulky." These appear to include: NY Evidence List • Items 16127-130 (4 boxes)

y" photos (Florida Items 1, Subitems 8, 15a, 15b and 15c), are we permitted to photograph those or not? If not, we will need them transported to 500 Pearl. Third, Florida Item 8, Subitem 8, says it is Sixteen DVD-R Discs from PESO but you do not indicate that we can review those. Why? We need to addre

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

ure nudity. As referenced above, once your team has seen those photos for yourselves, you can let me know if you will need any to be brought to 500 Pearl. • As I mentioned previously and is indicated in the spreadsheet, we are preparing a letter to defense counsel explaining why you will not be permi

your team can see the evidence for yourselves and let me know if you need any of the items you are not permitted to photograph to be brought to 500 Pearl. Depending on the size of the item(s), we may need to figure out whether they can be brought later in the week once you have already reviewed severa

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

d, I have several issues. First, there are a couple of items that you have noted for the Bronx Warehouse but will in fact need to be brought to 500 Pearl for review because you labeled them as "Highly Confidential" and not "bulky." These appear to include: NY Evidence List • Items 16127-130 (4 boxes)

y" photos (Florida Items 1, Subitems 8, 15a, 15b and 15c), are we permitted to photograph those or not? If not, we will need them transported to 500 Pearl. Third, Florida Item 8, Subitem 8, says it is Sixteen DVD-R Discs from PBSO but you do not indicate that we can review those. Why? We need to addre

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

d, I have several issues. First, there are a couple of items that you have noted for the Bronx Warehouse but will in fact need to be brought to 500 Pearl for review because you labeled them as "Highly Confidential" and not "bulky." These appear to include: NY Evidence List • Items 16127-130 (4 boxes)

y" photos (Florida Items 1, Subitems 8, 15a, 15b and 15c), are we permitted to photograph those or not? If not, we will need them transported to 500 Pearl. Third, Florida Item 8, Subitem 8, says it is Sixteen DVD-R Discs from PBSO but you do not indicate that we can review those. Why? We need to addre

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

-Images: image00 I jpg All, Today the Marshals and the FBI informed me that they are able to arrange for your client and the evidence to be at 500 Pearl in time for the review to start as early as 8am each morning of the review period. The review can still continue until 4:30pm each day. In order to

ure nudity. As referenced above, once your team has seen those photos for yourselves, you can let me know if you will need any to be brought to 500 Pearl. • As I mentioned previously and is indicated in the spreadsheet, we are preparing a letter to defense counsel explaining why you will not be permi

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

y" photos (Florida Items 1, Subitems 8, 15a, 15b and 15c), are we permitted to photograph those or not? If not, we will need them transported to 500 Pearl. Third, Florida Item 8, Subitem 8, says it is Sixteen DVD-R Discs from PBSO but you do not indicate that we can review those. Why? We need to addre

d, I have several issues. First, there are a couple of items that you have noted for the Bronx Warehouse but will in fact need to be brought to 500 Pearl for review because you labeled them as "Highly Confidential" and not "bulky." These appear to include: NY Evidence List • Items 16127-130 (4 boxes)

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

y" photos (Florida Items 1, Subitems 8, 15a, 15b and 15c), are we permitted to photograph those or not? If not, we will need them transported to 500 Pearl. EFTA00098000 Third, Florida Item 8, Subitem 8, says it is Sixteen DVD-R Discs from PBSO but you do not indicate that we can review those. Why? W

d, I have several issues. First, there are a couple of items that you have noted for the Bronx Warehouse but will in fact need to be brought to 500 Pearl for review because you labeled them as "Highly Confidential" and not "bulky." These appear to include: NY Evidence List • Items 18127-130 (4 boxes)

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

d, I have several issues. First, there are a couple of items that you have noted for the Bronx Warehouse but will in fact need to be brought to 500 Pearl for review because you labeled them as "Highly Confidential" and not "bulky." These appear to include: NY Evidence List • Items 16127-130 (4 boxes)

y" photos (Florida Items 1, Subitems 8, 15a, 15b and 15c), are we permitted to photograph those or not? If not, we will need them transported to 500 Pearl. Third, Florida Item 8, Subitem 8, says it is Sixteen DVD-R Discs from PBSO but you do not indicate that we can review those. Why? We need to addre

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio

d, I have several issues. First, there are a couple of items that you have noted for the Bronx Warehouse but will in fact need to be brought to 500 Pearl for review because you labeled them as "Highly Confidential" and not "bulky." These appear to include: EFTA00098016 NY Evidence List • Items 1612

y" photos (Florida Items 1, Subitems 8, 15a, 15b and 15c), are we permitted to photograph those or not? If not, we will need them transported to 500 Pearl. Third, Florida Item 8, Subitem 8, says it is Sixteen DVD-R Discs from PBSO but you do not indicate that we can review those. Why? We need to addre

— Your email yesterday stated that these were all "electronic files" with no corresponding physical item. However, for several, the chart indicates "Blu-Ray Disks;" is there a reason we cannot inspect these? Another Florida item is listed as "one original recording of an interview dated 4/24/07"; I am suspicio