Epstein Secrets

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

o controlled group liability if the funds together held 80% or more of the portfolio company in question (together with the 2013 Sun Capital Case, the "Sun Capital Cases"). Although the extent of the impact of the holdings in the Sun Capital Cases is unclear, the possibility of trade or business characterization re

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

o controlled group liability if the funds together held 80% or more of the portfolio company in question (together with the 2013 Sun Capital Case, the "Sun Capital Cases"). Although the extent of the impact of the holdings in the Sun Capital Cases is unclear, the possibility of trade or business characterization re

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

o controlled group liability if the funds together held 80% or more of the portfolio company in question (together with the 2013 Sun Capital Case, the "Sun Capital Cases"). Although the extent of the impact of the holdings in the Sun Capital Cases is unclear, the possibility of trade or business characterization re

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

o controlled group liability if the funds together held 80% or more of the portfolio company in question (together with the 2013 Sun Capital Case, the "Sun Capital Cases"). Although the extent of the impact of the holdings in the Sun Capital Cases is unclear, the possibility of trade or business characterization re

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

o controlled group liability if the funds together held 80% or more of the portfolio company in question (together with the 2013 Sun Capital Case, the "Sun Capital Cases"). Although the extent of the impact of the holdings in the Sun Capital Cases is unclear, the possibility of trade or business characterization re