Epstein Secrets

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

her the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. The Interests are being offered pursuant to an

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

her the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. The Interests are being offered pursuant to an

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

her the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. The Interests are being offered pursuant to an

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

her the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. The Interests are being offered pursuant to an

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

her the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. The Interests are being offered pursuant to an