Epstein Secrets

D -16334060.5 34 EFTA00803552 hereto consent and submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New Yoir the county of New York and of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkl Section 14.08 No Third-Party Rights. This Agreement is intended solely for the benefit of the parties heret

und. For the avoidance of doubt, an Investment made on separate dates is deemed to constitute a separate Investment. "Investment Company Act" means the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended from time to time, or any successor statute. "Limited Partner" means any limited partner admitted as a Limited Partner to the

D -16334060.5 34 EFTA00614696 hereto consent and submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New Yoir the county of New York and of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkl Section 14.08 No Third-Party Rights. This Agreement is intended solely for the benefit of the parties heret

und. For the avoidance of doubt, an Investment made on separate dates is deemed to constitute a separate Investment. "Investment Company Act" means the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended from time to time, or any successor statute. "Limited Partner" means any limited partner admitted as a Limited Partner to the

D -16354060.5 34 EFTA00614654 hereto consent and submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New Yoin the county of New York and of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkl Section 14.08 No Third-Party Rights. This Agreement is intended solely for the benefit of the parties heret

und. For the avoidance of doubt, an Investment made on separate dates is deemed to constitute a separate Investment. "Investment Company Act" means the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended from time to time, or any successor statute. "Limited Partner" means any limited partner admitted as a Limited Partner to the

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th

regarded for ERISA controlled group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fac

he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th