Epstein Secrets

iring Sheriff's Deputies to guard him as equivalent to imprisonment. Mr. Acosta specifically rejected that suggestion. It is our understanding from the Sheriff's Office that Mr. Epstein is paying off-duty Sheriff's Deputies to guard him while he "works" at Mr. Goldberger's office building each day. As you remember,

the state court file, you neglected to inform our Office that, on July 21, 2008, Judge McSorley modified the judgment nunc pm tunc to an "Order of Community Control I." This same language was the basis for the objection in my letter of June 26, 2008 and directly contradicts the language of the Non-Prosecution Agree

iring Sheriff's Deputies to guard him as equivalent to imprisonment. Mr. Acosta specifically rejected that suggestion. It is our understanding from the Sheriff's Office that Mr. Epstein is paying off-duty Sheriff's Deputies to guard him while he "works" at office buildin each da . As you remember, shortly before M

the state court file, you neglected to inform our Office that, on July 21, 2008, Judge McSorley modified the judgment nunc pm tunc to an "Order of Community Control I." This same language was the basis for the objection in my letter of June 26, 2008 and directly contradicts the Ian ua e of the Non-Prosecution Agree

iring Sheriff's Deputies to guard him as equivalent to imprisonment. Mr. Acosta specifically rejected that suggestion. It is our understanding from the Sheriff's Office that Mr. Epstein is paying off-duty Sheriff's Deputies to guard him while he "works" at Mr. Goldberger's office building each day. As you remember,

the state court file, you neglected to inform our Office that, on July 21, 2008, Judge McSorley modified the judgment nunc pm tunc to an "Order of Community Control I." This same language was the basis for the objection in my letter of June 26, 2008 and directly contradicts the language of the Non-Prosecution Agree