Epstein Secrets

4 Justin Horton • c W Subject: Doe v. Indyke, et al., 1:19-cv-08673-KPF, Plaintiffs Response to Defendants' Letters Filed Nov. 5, 2019 Dear Judge Failla: I write on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe to attach a courtesy copy of a letter just filed by Roberta Kaplan as ECF 21 in the above-captioned case.

Indyke, et al., 1:19-cv-08673-KPF, Plaintiffs Response to Defendants' Letters Filed Nov. 5, 2019 Dear Judge Failla: I write on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe to attach a courtesy copy of a letter just filed by Roberta Kaplan as ECF 21 in the above-captioned case. The letter responds to Defendants' two let

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10118 TEL I FAX WWW.KAPLANHECKER,COM November 6, 2019 Re: Doe v. lndyke et al., No. 19-cv-08673 (S.D.N.Y.) (KPF) Dear Judge Failla: We represent Jane Doe in the above-captioned action. We write in response to Defendants' two letters filed yesterday regarding: (1) related case s

118 TEL I FAX WWW.KAPLANHECKER,COM November 6, 2019 Re: Doe v. lndyke et al., No. 19-cv-08673 (S.D.N.Y.) (KPF) Dear Judge Failla: We represent Jane Doe in the above-captioned action. We write in response to Defendants' two letters filed yesterday regarding: (1) related case status (ECF 19); and (2)

York Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 19-cv-8673-KPF (S.D.N.Y.) Dear Judges Failla and Freeman: We represent Plaintiff Jane Doe in the above-captioned action. We write to respond to the letter submitted by Defendants on January 12

0 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 19-cv-8673-KPF (S.D.N.Y.) Dear Judges Failla and Freeman: We represent Plaintiff Jane Doe in the above-captioned action. We write to respond to the letter submitted by Defendants on January 12, 2020 (Doc. No. 43), and to respectfully req

say something on the subject? MS. KAPLAN: Your Honor, Roberta Kaplan. I'm counsel for the pseudonymous plaintiff in the case pending before Judge Failla. You heard I think a number of times Mr. Moskowitz use the word extraordinary. And on that word and perhaps that word only I'm in full agreement w

k it all apart and put it all in one and I really didn't even need it at all. But thank you. And then in the binders I did get, with respect to the Jane Doe issue, the one thing that I actually wanted to see which was the two competing proposed orders, one of those was missing from the binder. Defendan