Epstein Secrets

members of the BOP staff did possess favorable information that alone does not impute knowledge to the prosecution team." (citing United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249, 255 (2d Cir. 1998)). Accordingly, Thomas' motion to compel the Government to disclose evidence in the possession of the BOP is DENIE

and a wide range of written [BOP] policies and regulations," as well as "statements for all of the witnesses interviewed during the investigation." Gov't Opp. at 8-9, ECF No. 35. Thomas argues that he is entitled to additional discovery on two grounds: (1) Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proced

members of the BOP staff did possess favorable information that alone does not impute knowledge to the prosecution team." (citing United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249, 255 (2d Cir. 1998)). Accordingly, Thomas' motion to compel the Government to disclose evidence in the possession of the BOP is DENIE

and a wide range of written [BOP] policies and regulations," as well as "statements for all of the witnesses interviewed during the investigation." Gov't Opp. at 8-9, ECF No. 35. Thomas argues that he is entitled to additional discovery on two grounds: (1) Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proced

members of the BOP staff did possess favorable information that alone does not impute knowledge to the prosecution team." (citing United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249, 255 (2d Cir. 1998)). Accordingly, Thomas' motion to compel the Government to disclose evidence in the possession of the BOP is DENIE

and a wide range of written [BOP] policies and regulations," as well as "statements for all of the witnesses interviewed during the investigation." Gov't Opp. at 8-9, ECF No. 35. Thomas argues that he is entitled to additional discovery on two grounds: (1) Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proced