Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
sked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
xed that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. So J. Lelkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
prospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys) Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
sked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ll prospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from M. o . Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein and his attorneys.' Not surprisingly, Ms. issued this subpoena without the requisite prior approval by the DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations. See United States Attorneys' Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded that she had consulted with the Department of Justice
asked that I forward." See Tab 36, November 28, 2007 Email from.. to J. Lefkowitz. (a) The proposed victim-notification letter cited as authority the "Justice for All Act of 2004" (which U.S. Attorney Acosta later agreed had no application to these circumstances). It referred to the addressees as minor "victims," sug
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (93)
Entities connected to both Office of Enforcement Operations and the "Justice for All Act
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Office·9 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION7 w/ Office·8 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON7 w/ Office·8 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON7 w/ Office·8 w/ the
RB
Roy Black
PERSON7 w/ Office·8 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON7 w/ Office·8 w/ the
Joseph Hatchett
PERSON7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
Florida Bar Website
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
Marc Rich
PERSON7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
Bill Clinton
PERSON7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
GL
Gerald Lefcourt
PERSON7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
the District Judges
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
Florida Grand
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
HE
Humberto "Bert" Ocariz, Esq
PERSON7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
Federal Complaints
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
the Office of Professional Responsibility
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
LJ
Landon Thomas Jr.
PERSON7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
Defense Counsel
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
Ocariz
PERSON7 w/ Office·7 w/ the
G. Lefcourt
PERSON7 w/ Office·7 w/ the