Epstein Secrets

vement The inclusion of Section 2255. a purely civil remedy. raises the risk of excessive government interference in private, civil matters. As Mr. Whitley states in his opinion. . .tninectmary entanglement of the government in such cases and the use of federal resources could improperly influence suc

prefer a quick resolution with compensation for damages and will always support any disposition that eliminates the need fur trial. See letter from Lily Ann Sanchez to dated August 2. 2007.1 For the duration of the negotiations, we then continued to encourage the use of a restitution fund in place of civil lia

vement The inclusion of Section 2255. a purely civil remedy. raises the risk of excessive government interference in private, civil matters. As Mr. Whitley states in his opinion, " . . .unueccssary entanglement of the government in such eases and the use of federal resources could improperly influence

ms prefer a quick resolution with compensatinn for damages and will always supped any disposition UM eliminates the need For trial. See letter from Lily Ann Sanchez to Chief Matthew Menchel dated August 2. 2007.1 For the duration of the negotiations. we then continued to encourage the use of a restitution fund i

ent • The inclusion or Section 2255. a purely civil remedy. raises the risk of excessive government interference in private, civil matters. As Mr. Whitley states in his ;minion. . . .unnecessary entanglement of the government in such cases and the use of federal resources could improperly influence s

s prefer a quick mutation with etimpensation for damages and will always support any disposition lieu eliminates the need Mr trial. See letter from Lily Ann Sanchez to Chief Matthew Menehel dated August 2, 2007.1 For the duration or the negotiations, we then continued to encourage the Me of a restitution fund in

e Agreement, the SDFL unilaterally proposed to divest its right to select the attorney representative for the victims. Contrary to Messrs. Starr and Whitley's recent assertion that this was "engineered in a way that appears intended to profit particular lawyers in private practice in South Florida with

530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE e)001 Dear Jay, On September 24, 2007, your client, Jeffrey Epstein and two of his lawyers, Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. and Lily Ann Sanchez, Esq., in consultation with numerous other experienced and highly regarded lawyers, entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("the Agreement") with