Epstein Secrets

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

id just that. Prior to retaining Berger I had filed an award application for the UBS Reg Sho complaint. In my submission and my correspondence with Mckessy/OWB I made the claim based on OWB permissible rules to "open a new line of inquiry". One that would link the trading activity detailed in my ultimat

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

id just that. Prior to retaining Berger I had filed an award application for the UBS Reg Sho complaint. In my submission and my correspondence with Mckessy/OWB I made the claim based on OWB permissible rules to "open a new line of inquiry". One that would link the trading activity detailed in my ultimat

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

id just that. Prior to retaining Berger I had filed an award application for the UBS Reg Sho complaint. In my submission and my correspondence with Mckessy/OWB I made the claim based on OWB permissible rules to "open a new line of inquiry". One that would link the trading activity detailed in my ultimat

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

id just that. Prior to retaining Berger I had filed an award application for the UBS Reg Sho complaint. In my submission and my correspondence with Mckessy/OWB I made the claim based on OWB permissible rules to "open a new line of inquiry". One that would link the trading activity detailed in my ultimat