Epstein Secrets

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

tion. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before EFTA00067737 the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

tion. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before EFTA00076867 the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

tion. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before EFTA00069027 the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me

015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading activity in just 1 OTCM Money laundering shell: Magnum d'Or where Opco traded less than 1 million shares. CLEARLY the SEC Opco complaint was based on the trading activity in the FINRA Opco AML complaint: my

iminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the me