Epstein Secrets

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. www.sec.gov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. www.sec.gov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

w 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. iww. sec MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive

makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR

orth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my extensive