Back to People & Entities
Hanover/Magna
Organization
Also known as:
Hanover Magna
144
Total Mentions
144
Documents
311
Connected Entities
Financial services reference
Document Mentions (20 of 144)
EFTA00072751.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00072751
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
EFTA00070362.pdf (email 10: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight)
1 mentionEFTA00070362_email_010
n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of
EFTA00070362.pdf (email 18: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015)
1 mentionEFTA00070362_email_018
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
Sponsored
EFTA00093864.pdf (email 8: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight)
1 mentionEFTA00093864_email_008
n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of
EFTA00093864.pdf (email 16: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015)
1 mentionEFTA00093864_email_016
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
EFTA00070202.pdf (email 6: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight)
1 mentionEFTA00070202_email_006
n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of
Sponsored
EFTA00070202.pdf (email 14: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015)
1 mentionEFTA00070202_email_014
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
EFTA00093702.pdf (email 9: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight)
1 mentionEFTA00093702_email_009
n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of
EFTA00093702.pdf (email 16: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015)
1 mentionEFTA00093702_email_016
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
Sponsored
EFTA00070043.pdf (email 9: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight)
1 mentionEFTA00070043_email_009
n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of
EFTA00070043.pdf (email 17: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015)
1 mentionEFTA00070043_email_017
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
EFTA00069716.pdf (email 8: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight)
1 mentionEFTA00069716_email_008
n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of
Sponsored
EFTA00069716.pdf (email 16: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015)
1 mentionEFTA00069716_email_016
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
EFTA00071966.pdf (email 8, pages 89-108)
1 mentionEFTA00071966_email_008
n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of
EFTA00071966.pdf (email 16: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015)
1 mentionEFTA00071966_email_016
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
Sponsored
EFTA00080676.pdf (email 9: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight)
1 mentionEFTA00080676_email_009
n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of
EFTA00080676.pdf (email 17: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015)
1 mentionEFTA00080676_email_017
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
EFTA00072134.pdf (email 5: Fw: Formal appeal for denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight)
1 mentionEFTA00072134_email_005
n their Preliminary Determination Opco Award Denial for " Investigators never saw my information". Yet, SEC actions based on my information include: Hanover/Magna, JMJ/Keener, Fife, Southridge/Hicks, Opco, and UBSS. Missing somehow: NITE, Handler/Jefferies, Blackstone/Schwarzman etc etc. The last overt act of
Sponsored
EFTA00072134.pdf (email 12: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015)
1 mentionEFTA00072134_email_012
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
EFTA00072364.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00072364
makes no mention of illegal naked shorting which is clearly evident in the CGFIA 10Q referenced below. THIS IS MY INFORMATION. So, why aren't NITE, Hanover/Magna and UBSS implicated in the SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint? What my TCR clearly and irrefutably proves: NITE was engaged in illegal activity both BEFOR
Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 311)
CD
Chris Dilorio
PersonIndividual referenced in Epstein documents
144 docs144 co-mentions
Jared Kushner
PersonAmerican businessman and real estate investor (born 1981)
144 docs144 co-mentions
Clayton
LocationCity in and county seat of St. Louis County, Missouri, United States
143 docs143 co-mentions
Donald Trump
PersonPresident of the United States (2017–2021, 2025–present)
126 docs126 co-mentions
Michael Milken
PersonAmerican investor
125 docs125 co-mentions
Ladenburg
OrganizationLadenburg Thalmann Financial Services
123 docs123 co-mentions
CR
Crede
PersonNER artifact - company or organization name misclassified as person
123 docs123 co-mentions
MW
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)
123 docs123 co-mentions
Credit Suisse
OrganizationSwiss multinational banking institution
123 docs123 co-mentions
NewLead
OrganizationNER artifact: company or system name extracted from documents
123 docs123 co-mentions
Colorado
LocationState of the United States of America
123 docs123 co-mentions
SEC NY
OrganizationSEC regional office in New York
123 docs123 co-mentions
Liechtenstein
LocationCountry in Central Europe
119 docs119 co-mentions
Gruntal
OrganizationFormer American brokerage firm (Gruntal & Co.)
119 docs119 co-mentions
Icahn
PersonRefers to Carl Icahn, billionaire activist investor, referenced in SEC whistleblower complaints about financial fraud networks
118 docs118 co-mentions
Michael Cohen
PersonAmerican former attorney and former Republican official
118 docs118 co-mentions
Sullivan Cromwell
OrganizationLaw firm (Sullivan & Cromwell LLP)
118 docs118 co-mentions
BBH AML
OrganizationBrown Brothers Harriman AML compliance division
107 docs107 co-mentions
CH
Carl Hoecker
PersonFormer FBI inspector, referenced in Epstein case oversight documents
107 docs107 co-mentions
RT
Robin Traxler
PersonDOJ prosecutor, referenced in Epstein case oversight documents
107 docs107 co-mentions