Epstein Secrets

by the corporations which are defendants in the civil case, the considerations . . . militating against disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 211 (1979)). In response to such third-party subpoenas to law-enforcement witnesses, we anticipate that it

tion in the trial court. 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k). 09/12/2019 )099 G9AM0 MINUS. SUM 340.COCOMM GILOVE. Falelk 3313) Pa CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331539 EFTA 00204265 EFTA02729256 , Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2009 Page 3 of 41 I

6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

o William J. Berger Deanna K. Shullman Spencer T. Kuvin 09/12/2079 otaa—,-(44 CSAL—L. E KREUSLER-WALSH P CONFIDE CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19411 SDNY_GM_00331639 EFTA 00204365 EFTA02729351 • IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPS

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

emphasis is supplied unless indicated otherwise. The following symbol is used: A — Petitioner's appendix. 0911212019 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331617 EFTA_00204343 EFTA02729329 FACTUAL BACKGROUND In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein for felony

al rule."). 10 09/1212019 Page CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331792 EFTA_002045 I EFTA02729503 material so needed." Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 211, 222-23 (1979). The United States Supreme Court has consistently "recognized that the proper functioning of our

d disclosure of the confidential non- prosecution between the U.S. government and Mr. Epstein to third parties. Just 1 09/12/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 CONFPI535ENTIAL SDNY_GM_00331783 EFTA 00204509 EFTA02729494 last week, Judge Marra reviewed the non-prosecution agreement and addendum