Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal
the procedures designated therein would not apply since Judge Pucillo filed and sealed the documents sua sponte, not by motion. To the extent that the Administrative Order conflicts with the version of rule 2.420 then in effect, the rule prevails. Judge Pucillo was not required to follow Administrative Order 2.032 when
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal
the procedures designated therein would not apply since Judge Pucillo filed and sealed the documents sua sponte, not by motion. To the extent that the Administrative Order conflicts with the version of rule 2.420 then in effect, the rule prevails. Judge Pucillo was not required to follow Administrative Order 2.032 when
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal
the procedures designated therein would not apply since Judge Pucillo filed and sealed the documents sua sponte, not by motion. To the extent that the Administrative Order conflicts with the version of rule 2.420 then in effect, the rule prevails. Judge Pucillo was not required to follow Administrative Order 2.032 when
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal
the procedures designated therein would not apply since Judge Pucillo filed and sealed the documents sua sponte, not by motion. To the extent that the Administrative Order conflicts with the version of rule 2.420 then in effect, the rule prevails. Judge Pucillo was not required to follow Administrative Order 2.032 when
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (110)
Entities connected to both Douglas Oil Co. and the Administrative Order
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON45 w/ Douglas·5 w/ the
Michael Douglas
PERSON45 w/ Douglas·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION40 w/ Douglas·4 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON37 w/ Douglas·4 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON35 w/ Douglas·4 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON34 w/ Douglas·5 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION29 w/ Douglas·3 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON28 w/ Douglas·3 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Douglas·4 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON16 w/ Douglas·5 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON17 w/ Douglas·4 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON18 w/ Douglas·3 w/ the
West Palm Beach
LOCATION16 w/ Douglas·3 w/ the
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON15 w/ Douglas·4 w/ the
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON16 w/ Douglas·3 w/ the
Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Douglas·4 w/ the
Kenna
PERSON12 w/ Douglas·3 w/ the
Paul Cassell
PERSON13 w/ Douglas·2 w/ the
Palm Beach County Courthouse
LOCATION10 w/ Douglas·4 w/ the
CH
Chambers
PERSON11 w/ Douglas·2 w/ the