Epstein Secrets

8 F.3d 1308, 1317 (10th Cir. 2008) (holding "that the CVRA does not provide 'victims' with a right of access to the government's files"); cf. In re Slier, 571 F.3d 604, 609 (6th Cir. 2009) (holding that "the CVRA does not provide an independent right to obtain PSRs"); Kenna v. United States, 453 F.3d

-cv-80736-KAM Document 462 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2019 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Civil Action No. PETITIONERS, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA • Government's Response to Petition

eding, and the right to 26 EFTA00205649 confer with the government's attorney, but is silent as to documents offered during the trial. See In re Slier, 571 F.3d at 609-10. Petitioners' belief that they are entitled to grand jury records also fails. The traditional rule of grand jury secrecy may be

rt support a finding of jurisdiction, are the following discovery requests: • An order from this Court that the Government provide Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 all information in its possession, including documents and correspondence, about why it decided not to prosecute Epstein's crimes against them (

on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 28 of 101 confer with the government's attorney, but is silent as to documents offered during the trial. See In re Slier, 571 F.3d at 609-10. Petitioners' belief that they are entitled to grand jury records also fails. The traditional rule of grand jury secrecy may be

rt support a finding of jurisdiction, are the following discovery requests: • An order from this Court that the Government provide Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 all information in its possession, including documents and correspondence, about why it decided not to prosecute Epstein's crimes against them (

U.S. Attorney's Office properly conferred in a timely fashion back in 2007"); id. at 24-25 ("If the Government had properly conferred with the two Jane Does ... [t]hese events would have provided Jane Doe 1 and 2 with much more information about Epstein's criminal conspiracy and its scope and operation,

be heard at a proceeding, and the right to confer with the government's attorney, but is silent as to documents offered during the trial. See In re Slier, 571 F.3d at 609-10. Petitioners argument that they are entitled to grand jury records similarly fails. The traditional rule of grand jury secrecy