Epstein Secrets

ot subject to being set aside, rescinded, or canceled — regardless of whether or not the government failed to comply with the CVRA. On the contrary, Santobello and its progeny require the USAO-SDFL to continue to abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and due process precludes this Court from

Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is a

/05/2013 Page 71 of 101 Exhibit C EFTA00799564 ase -cv- ocumen n ere. on 101 oc e age o Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO =ICAO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and through h

ot subject to being set aside, rescinded, or canceled — regardless of whether or not the government failed to comply with the CVRA. On the contrary, Santobello and its progeny require the USAO-SDFL to continue to abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and due process precludes this Court from

Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is a

/05/2013 Page 71 of 101 Exhibit C EFTA00795240 ase -cv- ocumen n ere. on 101 oc e age o Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO =ICAO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and through h

ot subject to being set aside, rescinded, or canceled — regardless of whether or not the government failed to comply with the CVRA. On the contrary, Santobello and its progeny require the USAO-SDFL to continue to abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and due process precludes this Court from

Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is a

cument n ere. on 101 oc e age o costs and is within the jurisdictional limits of this Court. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO 2008 CA 0 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and throu