Epstein Secrets

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Muhry does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) <a > ) <-

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his May 20

div, like for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: S (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his May 20

div, like for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. EFTA00088114

those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < =); (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject:

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his May 20

div, like for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: M = (USANYS) ; (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Relat

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: ivIcEnany, John (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE:

say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his May 20

v, like for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFIa's recusal. I can't see NIX, \ racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: S (USANYS) < (USANYS) c > Cc: < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Tou