Epstein Secrets

view that the fact of production of materials is Giglio? Or that the substance of her attorney's request and the government's responsive letter is Giglio? Just want to make sure we understand the theory. thanks, Alex. EFTA00088120

arded message: From: "McEnany, John (USANYS)" Date: Au ust 2 2020 at 2:30:39 PM EDT To: ' c2 )" Cc: "Jones, David (USANYS)" (USANYS)" >, "Kochevar, Steven (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Determinations under Touhy are somewhat discretionary and to the extent our O

view that the fact of production of materials is Giglio? Or that the substance of her attorney's request and the government's responsive letter is Giglio? Just want to make sure we understand the theory. thanks, Alex. From: McEnany, John (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2020 13:44 To: <En Cc: J

my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "McEnany, John (USANYS)" Date: August 2. 2020 at 2:30:39 PM EDT To: " Cc: "Jones, David (USANYS)" >, "Kochevar, Steven (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests USANYS)" Determinations under Touhy are somewhat discretionary and to the ex

r view that the fact of production of materials is Giglio? Or that the substance of her attorney's request and the government's responsive letter is Giglio? Just want to make sure we understand the theory. thanks, Alex. From: McEnany, John (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2020 13:44 To: Cc: Jones

From: "McEnany. John (USANYS)" T o: , 0 11 I/ II ) Cc: "Jones, David (USANYS)" > ' >, "Kochevar, Steven (USANYSY Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 18:30:39 +0000 1=a (USANYS)" Determinations under To