Epstein Secrets

to file a redacted version this letter motion. The proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this letter motion is a judicial document subject to the common law presumption o

"The original transcript, which includes a certification by the court reporter, is self-authenticating. See Fed. R. Evid. 902(4).1; United States v. McGee, 439 F. App'x 837, 839 (11th Cir. 2011) ("We have held that to satisfy the requirements of Rule 902(4), a certification need only identify the lega

to file a redacted version this letter motion. The proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this letter motion is a judicial document subject to the common law presumption o

"The original transcript, which includes a certification by the court reporter, is self-authenticating. See Fed. R. Evid. 902(4).1; United States v. McGee, 439 F. App'x 837, 839 (11th Cir. 2011) ("We have held that to satisfy the requirements of Rule 902(4), a certification need only identify the lega

to file a redacted version this letter motion. The proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this letter motion is a judicial document subject to the common law presumption o

"The original transcript, which includes a certification by the court reporter, is self-authenticating. See Fed. R. Evid. 902(4).1; United States v. McGee, 439 F. App'x 837, 839 (11th Cir. 2011) ("We have held that to satisfy the requirements of Rule 902(4), a certification need only identify the lega