Epstein Secrets

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 234 Filed 04/22/21 Page 1 of 5 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN April 22, 2021 The Hon. Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S.

the illegality." See Wong Sun, 371 U.S. at 488. What's more, "the burden of proof on [an] attenuation claim is on the government." United States v. Ghailani, 743 F. Supp. 2d 242, 259 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (ordering an evidentiary hearing to put the government to its burden of proving attenuation) (citing Unite

he Government becomes aware of any Brady material from any source, it will promptly disclose such material to the defense. EFTA00087762 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 3 to persons who are a part of the `prosecution team' . . . who perform investigative duties or make strategic decisions abo

te to AUSAs knowledge of reports prepared by FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); cf. United States v. Ghailani, 687 F. Supp. 2d 365, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (holding that, in the context of a speedy trial motion, other members of the Department of Justice who we

lications, financial records, travel records, property records, phone records, law enforcement reports, and other subpoena EFTA00092427 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 2 returns. The Government is continuing the process of reviewing and preparing productions of electronic discovery materials

te to AUSAs knowledge of reports prepared by FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); cf. United States v. Ghailani, 687 F. Supp. 2d 365, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (holding that, in the context of a speedy trial motion, other members of the Department of Justice who we

he Government becomes aware of any Brady material from any source, it will promptly disclose such material to the defense. EFTA00097965 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 3 to persons who are a part of the `prosecution team' . . . who perform investigative duties or make strategic decisions abo

te to AUSAs knowledge of reports prepared by FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); cf. United States v. Ghailani, 687 F. Supp. 2d 365, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (holding that, in the context of a speedy trial motion, other members of the Department of Justice who we

t of prosecutorial strategy, or (5) accompanied the prosecution to court proceedings." Middendorf, 2018 WL 3956494, at *4. EFTA00098807 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 4 III. The Government's Plan to Review Certain Files from the Florida Investigation A. Relevant Background Regarding the Fl

te to AUSAs knowledge of reports prepared by FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); cf. United States v. Ghailani, 687 F. Supp. 2d 365, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (holding that, in the context of a speedy trial motion, other members of the Department of Justice who we

, phone records, law enforcement reports, and other subpoena EFTA00099671 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 63 Filed 10/07/20 Page 2 of 8 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 2 returns. The Government is continuing the process of reviewing and preparing productions of electronic discovery materials

te to AUSAs knowledge of reports prepared by FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); cf. United States v. Ghailani, 687 F. Supp. 2d 365, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (holding that, in the context of a speedy trial motion, other members of the Department of Justice who we

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 234 Filed 04/22/21 Page 1 of 5 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN April 22, 2021 The Hon. Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Haddon. Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S.

v. Ghisiaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Response to Dkt. No. 227, Government's April 21.2021 Letter re Ms. Maxwell's Motions to Suppress Dear Judge Nathan: We write in response to the government's letter about Ms. Maxwell's pending motions to suppress and request for evidentiary hearing (Dkt. No. 227)

the illegality." See Wong Sun, 371 U.S. at 488. What's more, "the burden of proof on [an] attenuation claim is on the government." United States v. Ghailani, 743 F. Supp. 2d 242, 259 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (ordering an evidentiary hearing to put the government to its burden of proving attenuation) (citing Unite

d, in August, after the defendant sought an order directing the Government to disclose to defense counsel the identifies of the Minor Victims, Judge Nathan ruled that the request was premature, noting that production of discovery had just begun and the "parties have not yet engaged in discussions regar

U.S. 456, 463 (1996) ("[U]nder Rule 16(a)(2), [a defendant] may not examine Government work product in connection with his case."); United States v. Ghailani, 687 F. Supp. 2d 365, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (concluding that an internal government memorandum fell within Rule 16(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Crim