Epstein Secrets

he U.S. Attorney's Office (Comp1.11 11-13), the litigation concerning the Crime Victim's Rights Act (CVRA) still pending in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Compl. 11 15-16), and not Plaintiff's 2009 civil suit against Mr. Epstein (Compl. ¶¶ 17-21). No criminal charges were ever brought agai

eaders." Menninger Decl. Ex. C at 4-5. On April 7, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Marra denied Plaintiff's Joinder Motion, ordered the portions of the Joinder Motion pertaining to non-parties Although the Complaint does not explicitly mention the 2011 Statement, it appears Plaintiff believes it to be the "additi

inal charges were resolved by a guilty plea to a single Florida state law charge and a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. Unknown to the public and the victims at the time, Epstein's lawyers, including Defendant, were pressuring the Government to commit to

ationally televised news interviews, wrongfully claimed that Edwards and Cassell had engaged in unethical behavior warranting disbarment for filing the Joinder Motion that described Defendant's involvement with Epstein and Plaintiff. Edwards, who is a prominent lawyer for sexually abused women and children, and Ca

inal charges were resolved by a guilty plea to a single Florida state law charge and a non-prosecution agreement (a “NPA”) with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. Unknown to the public and the victims at the time, Epstein’s lawyers, including Dershowitz, were pressuring the Government to commit to t

nationally televised news interviews, wrongfully claimed that Edwards and Cassell had engaged in unethical behavior warranting disbarment for filing the Joinder Motion that described Dershowitz’s involvement with Epstein and Roberts. Edwards, who is a prominent attorney for sexually abused women and children, and Ca