Epstein Secrets

pstein. She alleged that she believed Epstein was the subject of a federal criminal investigation being conducted by the United States Government in the Southern District of Florida. Jane Doe acknowledge that Epstein had recently been prosecuted and pleaded guilty, on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court for Palm Beac

o one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law." Allen v. Tyson Inc. , 121 F.3d 642, 646 (11 di Cir. 1997), citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 252 (1986). Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), summary judgment is appropriate after adequate time for discovery and upon motion, against a p

k, Defendants. No. 96 CIV. 8307(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 1, 1998. Mary Jo White, Esq., United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, By Serene K. Nakano, Esq., Assistant United States Attorney, New York, for the United States. Wachtel & Masyr, LLP, By Steven J. Cohe

not to "weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). Summary judgment is inappropriate if, resolving all ambiguities and drawing all inferenc

--ritiec)a ° P" 4 I et fase 10-02612-RBR Doc 148-1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 10 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on 1.2 - /4 -10 Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FOR

ercome the motion, and the court must analyze "the evidence presented through the prism of the substantive evidentiary burden." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 254 (1986). UNDISPUTED FACTS Nearly all facts relating to the Plaintiff's prima facie case are undisputed. The facts in this case c

pstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls, including petitioners Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2, at his mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, located in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere in the United States and overseas. Victims' S.J. Mot., DE 361 at 8, 1 1. Because Epstein and his co-conspirators knowingl

judgment is proper. See Sainz v. Cabarceno Enterprises, Inc., No. 14-20608-CIV, 2015 WL 12551061, at *1 (■. Fla. 2015) (citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986)). The undisputed facts recited above plainly establish that the Government—with the knowledge of, and at the urging of Ep